Skip to content
Security QA Vendors

Ranking / Compare

Codoid vs ELEKS

Short answer

Codoid scores 28.1 and ranks 7; ELEKS scores 28.4 and ranks 6 of 12. They differ most on vendor's own security posture (tied with team scale and specialisation): ELEKS 3.0, Codoid 0.0 out of 10. Codoid: ISO 27001 is claimed without a certificate number or registry link, which scores zero under the rule.

Eight dimensions side by side

Scores out of 10 from the frozen methodology. The difference column is A minus B.
DimensionA: CodoidB: ELEKSDifference (A minus B)
1. Security-product evidence depth4.04.0±0.0
2. Product-class coverage2.02.0±0.0
3. Test-type depth6.04.0+2.0
4. Engagement longevity0.00.0±0.0
5. Third-party review signal0.00.0±0.0
6. Vendor's own security posture0.03.0−3.0
7. Team scale and specialisation3.00.0+3.0
8. Transparency5.07.5−2.5

Security-product evidence side by side

Codoid

  1. e-0045

    case-studyCase study, identity and access management

    codoid.com · undated · B single source · verified 2026-11-11

    Identity and access management; tests: functional, performance; team: 1; client not named; vendor-reported metric: Load testing simulated 10,000+ concurrent users

  2. e-0046

    case-studyCase study, identity and access management

    codoid.com · undated · C indirect · verified 2026-11-11

    Identity and access management; tests: automation, functional; client not named; vendor-reported metric: Over 1500 test cases were implemented and regularly executed through Jenkins jobs.

ELEKS

  1. e-0033

    case-studyCase study for ESET, endpoint protection and EDR

    eleks.com · undated · C indirect · verified 2026-11-11

    Endpoint protection and EDR; tests: performance, compatibility; team: 30 plus; client: ESET

Choose one or the other

Choose Codoid when

  • You want a QA-only company (team scale and specialisation, 3.0 against 0.0). Codoid: Headcount not confirmed by two consistent sources, 0 points; QA-only company, 3 points; no dedicated security-product QA page, 0 points. [e-0049] ELEKS: Headcount not confirmed by two consistent sources, 0 points; not QA-only, 0 points; no dedicated security-product QA page, 0 points.
  • You need functional testing and automation testing evidenced on a security product (test-type depth, 6.0 against 4.0). Codoid: Three test types evidenced on security products: functional, automation, performance. [e-0045][e-0046] ELEKS: Two test types evidenced on security products: performance, compatibility. [e-0033]

Choose ELEKS when

  • Your security team asks for a SOC 2 statement with auditor or year (vendor's own security posture, 3.0 against 0.0). ELEKS: Evidenced: SOC 2 Type II stated (2025). ISO 27001 is claimed without a certificate number. [e-0035] Codoid: ISO 27001 is claimed without a certificate number or registry link, which scores zero under the rule. [e-0049]
  • You want a published QA process page before the first call (transparency, 7.5 against 5.0). ELEKS: Three of four items present: public rate, published QA process page, team locations; missing: named leadership with profiles. [e-0034][e-0036] Codoid: Two of four items present: public rate, team locations; missing: named leadership with profiles, published QA process page. [e-0047]

Next steps

Scores are computed from publicly available evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They describe published evidence, not service quality. Re-verify with the vendor before contracting.