Skip to content
Security QA Vendors

Ranking / Compare

ELEKS vs TestDevLab

Short answer

ELEKS scores 28.4 and ranks 6; TestDevLab scores 28.5 and ranks 5 of 12. They differ most on team scale and specialisation: TestDevLab 9.0, ELEKS 0.0 out of 10. ELEKS: Headcount not confirmed by two consistent sources, 0 points; not QA-only, 0 points; no dedicated security-product QA page, 0 points.

Eight dimensions side by side

Scores out of 10 from the frozen methodology. The difference column is A minus B.
DimensionA: ELEKSB: TestDevLabDifference (A minus B)
1. Security-product evidence depth4.04.0±0.0
2. Product-class coverage2.02.0±0.0
3. Test-type depth4.02.0+2.0
4. Engagement longevity0.00.0±0.0
5. Third-party review signal0.00.0±0.0
6. Vendor's own security posture3.01.0+2.0
7. Team scale and specialisation0.09.0−9.0
8. Transparency7.55.0+2.5

Security-product evidence side by side

ELEKS

  1. e-0033

    case-studyCase study for ESET, endpoint protection and EDR

    eleks.com · undated · C indirect · verified 2026-11-11

    Endpoint protection and EDR; tests: performance, compatibility; team: 30 plus; client: ESET

TestDevLab

  1. e-0057

    case-studyCase study for Smart-ID, identity and access management

    testdevlab.com · 2017-12-14 · B single source · verified 2026-11-11

    Identity and access management; tests: compatibility; client: Smart-ID

Choose one or the other

Choose ELEKS when

  • You want a published QA process page before the first call (transparency, 7.5 against 5.0). ELEKS: Three of four items present: public rate, published QA process page, team locations; missing: named leadership with profiles. [e-0034][e-0036] TestDevLab: Two of four items present: public rate, team locations; missing: named leadership with profiles, published QA process page. [e-0058]
  • You need performance or load testing evidenced on a security product (test-type depth, 4.0 against 2.0). ELEKS: Two test types evidenced on security products: performance, compatibility. [e-0033] TestDevLab: One test type evidenced on security products: compatibility. [e-0057]
  • Your security team asks for a SOC 2 statement with auditor or year (vendor's own security posture, 3.0 against 1.0). ELEKS: Evidenced: SOC 2 Type II stated (2025). ISO 27001 is claimed without a certificate number. [e-0035] TestDevLab: Evidenced: a security page or named security officer. ISO 27001 is claimed without a certificate number. [e-0059][e-0060]

Choose TestDevLab when

  • You want a larger confirmed headcount, a QA-only company and a dedicated security-product QA page (team scale and specialisation, 9.0 against 0.0). TestDevLab: Headcount 250 to 999, 3 points; QA-only company, 3 points; dedicated security-product QA page, 3 points. [e-0058][e-0078][e-0059] ELEKS: Headcount not confirmed by two consistent sources, 0 points; not QA-only, 0 points; no dedicated security-product QA page, 0 points.

Next steps

Scores are computed from publicly available evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They describe published evidence, not service quality. Re-verify with the vendor before contracting.