Skip to content
Security QA Vendors

Ranking / Compare

QA Mentor vs QASource

Short answer

QA Mentor scores 32.4 and ranks 3; QASource scores 43.1 and ranks 2 of 12. They differ most on vendor's own security posture: QASource 7.0, QA Mentor 0.0 out of 10. QA Mentor: ISO 27001 is claimed without a certificate number or registry link, which scores zero under the rule.

Eight dimensions side by side

Scores out of 10 from the frozen methodology. The difference column is A minus B.
DimensionA: QA MentorB: QASourceDifference (A minus B)
1. Security-product evidence depth2.04.0−2.0
2. Product-class coverage2.04.0−2.0
3. Test-type depth2.08.0−6.0
4. Engagement longevity8.02.0+6.0
5. Third-party review signal3.03.0±0.0
6. Vendor's own security posture0.07.0−7.0
7. Team scale and specialisation6.03.0+3.0
8. Transparency5.02.5+2.5

Security-product evidence side by side

QA Mentor

  1. e-0071

    reviewClutch review, identity and access management

    clutch.co · 2024-01-08 · C indirect · verified 2026-11-11

    Identity and access management; tests: automation; duration: 48 months; client not named

QASource

  1. e-0010

    case-studyCase study, endpoint protection and EDR

    casestudies.com · undated · C indirect · verified 2026-11-11

    Endpoint protection and EDR; tests: functional, compatibility, api, automation; client not named; vendor-reported metric: 300% increase in regression testing coverage

  2. e-0011

    reviewClutch review, endpoint protection and EDR

    clutch.co · 2018-04-26 · B single source · verified 2026-11-11

    Endpoint protection and EDR; tests: api; team: 7; client not named

  3. e-0012

    reviewClutch review, network security

    clutch.co · 2023-04-11 · C indirect · verified 2026-11-11

    Network security; tests: functional, api; team: 2 to 5; duration: 6 months; client not named

Choose one or the other

Choose QA Mentor when

  • You want an evidenced long engagement with a security vendor (engagement longevity, 8.0 against 2.0). QA Mentor: Longest evidenced engagement with a security vendor: 48 months. [e-0071] QASource: Longest evidenced engagement with a security vendor: 6 months. [e-0012]
  • You want a larger confirmed headcount (team scale and specialisation, 6.0 against 3.0). QA Mentor: Headcount 250 to 999, 3 points; QA-only company, 3 points; no dedicated security-product QA page, 0 points. [e-0072][e-0079][e-0073] QASource: Headcount not confirmed by two consistent sources, 0 points; QA-only company, 3 points; no dedicated security-product QA page, 0 points. [e-0015]
  • You want a public rate before the first call (transparency, 5.0 against 2.5). QA Mentor: Two of four items present: public rate, team locations; missing: named leadership with profiles, published QA process page. [e-0072] QASource: One of four items present: team locations; missing: public rate, named leadership with profiles, published QA process page. [e-0014][e-0015]

Choose QASource when

  • Your security team asks for an ISO 27001 certificate reference, a published test-data handling statement and a security page or named security officer (vendor's own security posture, 7.0 against 0.0). QASource: Evidenced: ISO 27001 with reference IS 791318; a published test-data handling statement; a security page or named security officer. [e-0016] QA Mentor: ISO 27001 is claimed without a certificate number or registry link, which scores zero under the rule. [e-0073]
  • You need functional testing, OS, browser or agent compatibility testing and API testing evidenced on a security product (test-type depth, 8.0 against 2.0). QASource: Four test types evidenced on security products: functional, automation, api, compatibility. [e-0010][e-0011][e-0012] QA Mentor: One test type evidenced on security products: automation. [e-0071]
  • More published security-product cases weigh most for you (security-product evidence depth, 4.0 against 2.0). QASource: Three verified security-product QA items, one of them older than 60 months and counted at half. Of these, zero name the client, two state team size or duration and one states a metric. [e-0010][e-0011][e-0012] QA Mentor: One verified security-product QA item. Of these, zero name the client, one states team size or duration and zero state a metric. [e-0071]

Next steps

Scores are computed from publicly available evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They describe published evidence, not service quality. Re-verify with the vendor before contracting.